This version of the site is now archived. See the next iteration at

Family Vocation

In Family Vocation, Gene Veith and his daughter Mary Moerbe apply Luther’s views on vocation to family. (Shocking, I know.)

Sometime in the last two or three years, I stumbled on Gene Veith’s blog, Cranach: The Blog of Veith. Though I didn’t initially add his blog to my reading list, I kept finding myself back there. Links from a variety of other sources I read regularly kept drawing me back, and though in general I tend to skip over blogs with cultural or political emphases – it’s just not my main focus – I found his thought and writing unusually compelling. His blog is now among my most regular reads.

One of Veith’s major projects has been reintroducing evangelicals to Lutheran thought on vocation. I’ve heard nothing but good about his previous book on vocation, so when I saw that he’d released a book on relating vocation to family, it immediately went on my reading list.

book cover image

This was a great read, and easy to get through. Veith and Moerbe write well. The same clear, interesting prose that makes me keep coming back to Veith’s blog made the book great reading. It’s a testament to the pair’s skill as authors that in 250 pages repeating the same basic theme – that God is profoundly glorified in our apparently mundane tasks as husbands, wives, fathers, mothers, siblings, sons and daughters – the book never becomes repetitious or annoying.

That theme is one many of the believers I know need to hear. For many evangelicals, meaning in life is reduced to the extent to which we are engaged in “ministry” – tightly defined as explicit proclamation of the gospel. I certainly never wish to diminish the proclamation of the gospel; it is, in this age, the great task to which we have all been commissioned. However, evangelism is not the only means by which the glory of God in Christ is displayed. If, as the catechism says, the chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever, then our chief end subsumes evangelism – not the other way around. Our calling likewise encompasses the work we do day to day, the ways we interact with our neighbors (even apart from explicit discussions of the gospel), and yes, our roles in our families.

The idea of calling saturates this book. Unlike many evangelical approaches to the idea of calling, however, Veith and Moerbe have little time for mystical experiences of “feeling called” to a given task. We are called, they suggest, to the very places in this life that God has put us. Vocation, a calling to a given task, is not so mysterious as evangelicals tend to make it. We are called to be workers, parents, children, spouses, neighbors, church-members – called, in some sense, to be human, properly human, in all the ordinary paths of life in just such a way that Christ is most glorified by everything we do, not simply our gospel proclamation.

Veith and Moerbe rightly challenge both men and women to reevaluate their approach to family in light of this reality. If God has called us to our families, given us the task of glorifying him right where we are in all the messiness of ordinary relationships, then we must give that calling its due. And the authors do a masterful job tracing the calling of God out through every aspect of familial life. They puncture a few evangelical shibboleths along the way, and delightfully poke holes in a number of liberal Christianity’s foibles at opportune moments.

If Family Vocation has a single weakness, it is the same weakness I have observed in many Lutheran contexts. Though Lutherans rightly value the congregation – so much so that I wish many of my Baptistic brothers and sisters would esteem it half so highly – they sometimes allow this to eclipse other, equally important truths. In this case, this tendency is most prominent in the section on partenting. Veith and Moerbe spend some time examining the evidence of a father’s impact on his children’s church-going, and they repeatedly emphasize the ways God works in a child’s life through the church.

I agree, of course, with the value the authors place on the congregation, and find it difficult to overstate how much I wish evangelicals would recapture a sense of the centrality of the church in the life of the believer. But there seemed to be running through this section a quiet assumption that children growing up in the church will generally turn out all right. Unfortunately, in both evangelical and Lutheran circles, this assumption has proven spiritually deadly for generations. I’m sure, from the rest of the content of the book, that Veith and Moerbe affirm the need for parents to teach their children the gospel. In the way they write, however, they seem to give the impression that this is secondary to just getting the kids to church.

Having known quite a few kids who just made it to church and then ended up walking away entirely as they grew old, I’m simply not persuaded of the efficacy of this approach. Parents need to be quite intentional about proclaiming Christ to their children. Veith and Merbe say as much, too, but parental responsibility for catechizing their children always seems secondary to the role of the church. The potential for parental abdication of spiritual responsibility is significant and worrisome.

Family Vocation was nonetheless an excellent book. Married or single, this book has something to offer, because all of us are someone’s child, and all of us have parents and grandaprents; most of us have siblings. For the father struggling to understand his role in his children’s life, or the husband thinking about how his marriage glorifies God, or the young mother wondering what the value of her child-raising is in the big picture, or the two-career family wrestling with the balance of work and children, there is wisdom to be found here. Perhaps we evangelicals would do to listen to the Lutherans a bit more – though it seems they could learn a thing or two from us, as well.


  • Kurt Cockran thought to say:

    Great review and great summary of vocation! Veith still remains the primary authority in Lutheranism on the doctrine of vocation, even as a layman! To any readers reading, I definitely second Veith’s readability. While I haven’t read this one yet (but hope to soon), his other books are phenomenal. I have listened to Veith and Moerbe speak about much of what they write about on a series of interviews they did on Issues, Etc. soon after the book was published. You can check it out here,

    Like I said, I haven’t read the book yet, but coming from someone who has grown up in the Lutheran church, I would say that the reason Veith and Moerbe take this quiet assumption that children growing up in the church will generally turn out all right is because no other denomination of church I have had experience with has placed as much emphasis on education from the earliest of ages and throughout the entire youth. The parents, though, are instrumental in keeping them going to the church because that is where the means of grace are given and where they grow in the knowledge of God and gain the sword of the Spirit to fight off the temptations of our world to want to stop receiving these gifts of God given in the Divine Service. I have heard of many people in my evangelical circles who say their middle school youth group felt more like play time all the time than it was digging in the Word and learning more and growing in the faith.

    On that note, historically Lutheranism has put a HUGE emphasis on the education and upbringing of a child in the faith taking place primarily in the home. Luther wrote the Small Catechism mainly to the heads of households to teach to his family. In fact, the chief parts begin with the header, “As the head of the family should teach them in a simple way to his household.”

    The church realizes though that nowadays the heads of the household are not necessarily always the ones who will have the Small Catechism memorized and be willing to be that head teacher of the household, so the teaching of the catechism is also done (and done well!) in the church, which is where I learned it going to catechesis class for two years every Wednesday while in middle school. While I definitely required continuing education in high school and in college, this foundation stuck with me, in spite of the lack of instruction I received from my father.

    We would also place a bit more efficacy to this approach of primarily getting the kids to church because we believe the Sunday morning Divine Services are efficacious themselves. That is, it is the setting where God comes to us to shower His gifts upon us by the preaching and singing of the Gospel to one another, confessing our sins and being forgiven by Christ Himself using the voice of the pastor, and the promise of life in His body and blood in Holy Communion, that all bring the salvation that we need to be sustained in this dying world that wants nothing but to keep us away from these gifts. So I wouldn’t necessarily say that Lutherans put an over-emphasis on getting the kids to simply be in the church on a weekly basis, but that taken together with instruction in the home is what will sustain a believer all through life.

    Looking forward to giving this a read!

    Offer a rejoinder↓

Pipe up!

Anonymity is most unhelpful. Please identify yourself!

You may use GitHub-flavored Markdown and/or these HTML tags and attributes:
<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>